
Whoever has just linked to my website, thanks. You doubled my visits. Email radiomankc@gmail.com to let me know what it was that caused you to do that. Good web/blog operators surely want to know what we're doing right so we can do right more often!
As to our BZ talk heroes today?? Neither of them have military-age sons. Shanin is childless and Parks are still young. So it's easy for them to be bellicose with other people's high school and afterwards sons. Ya'd think they were like Kit Bond, eager for votes from McDonnell Douglas workers over in St Louis. And Pat Roberts, representing Wichita's Boeing people and other Kansas business owners with no military sons.
The Taliban's not interested in attacking the US... they just want to control the villages and we just don't' have enough Army men to chase those bandidos around the desert! It's a HUGE country and there's nothing in it for us.The caller wasn't a professional interviewer.. but the follow up question, 'WINNING WHAT?" would have surely caused our radio heros to stutter. What did Vietnam win us? Cheaper RICE? This is the advantage talk show people have in talk show debates with ordinary folks.
Scott caught the caller off guard, asking 'what war after WWII was a worthy war?" It's one of his favorite radio debate questions. Well ya can bushwack an amateur caller.. like fishin in a barrel!All Bush 43's unprovoked adventure in Iraq managed to do was eliminate the totalitarian buffer between Iran and Saudi Arabia. If there's any reason why we shouldn't leave Iraq now, it's that. As Colin Powell said before he left the Bush Administration in disgust, "we break it, we own it."
What did Vietnam give us besides 50k dead sons, countless maimed and screwed up? A whole lot of boat people and their children, we had to take or else they'd have been murdered when we left town! At least we let them come in finally. Adds to the flavors of the mix we call America, I guess. Every Viet in America is a reminder of our foreign policy stupidity... stupidity Robt McNamera apologized for, but our heroes on KMBZ apparently didn't make note of! Amazingly thy still think Vietnam was a war we could have WON.
We need to cock the pistol and bomb Tehran's government to the stone age before they set the world on fire with their threats, their tests, their deceptions. You want war? I'ts coming. But Bush the Younger picked the wrong country in Iraq. And he wasn't smart enough to get out of Afghanistan after the Al-Queda hightailed it. And especially. For a guy as reckless as he was in Iraq, he didn't finish the job to get IRAN off the agenda for the new president. What a fucckin wiener!
The President of the United States can fly anywhere he wants, and run the country from Air Force One. He can go to Copenhagen and arm twist Republicans sold out to big health care, or talk to the hawks here or in Israel, or ignore people like KIT BOND who want us to wage yet more war! Like Vietnam. Shameful he's from our state!By Guy T. Saperstein, AlterNet. Posted September 23, 2009.
Two days ago, the report was leaked to the press.
This leak could not have been inadvertent, as the leaked copy had been heavily redacted, with classified materials deleted. It is hard to see this as anything but an attempt to box in Obama and put pressure on him to agree to more troops, whether any good strategy supports investing more troops, or not.
But before anyone, let alone Obama, starts bending to military pressure, let's ask how much deference U.S. generals deserve.
We all respect the commitment and sacrifice of American soldiers -- they are doing difficult and dangerous work few of us would want to do, and they do it under terrible conditions, tremendous pressure and great threat to life -- but should the military establishment and its misadventures be beyond criticism?
Georges Clemenceau, former French prime minister and the French war minister who negotiated the Versailles Treaty to end World War I, once said, "War is much too serious a matter to be entrusted to the military."
He had watched Allied generals misperceive and misunderstand strategy and become bogged down in deadly trenches for four years, killing millions in the process. Do our generals deserve any more respect? Is their advice any better?
For most of the past 60 years, the American military mostly has been unprepared for the conflicts America has gotten into, starting with Korea.
Fifteen years after Korea, the military was planning to fight a land war with the Soviet Union, but not a jungle war in Vietnam; it lacked the training and equipment for jungle combat, and it had no clue either how to fight an insurgency or how to contest the political aspects of the war, which ultimately led to American defeat.
Thirty years later, after not anticipating 9/11, the military still was equipped mainly to fight a massive land war in Europe, not an insurgency, either in Iraq or Afghanistan, and again has failed to comprehend the political dimensions of those wars.
We have spent, and continue to spend, a gigantic (and unsustainable) portion of the nation's treasure on defense -- in the process crowding out important social services -- but has the national security state and overreliance on the military provided security?
It has built hugely expensive weapons systems that have little or no relevance to current threats, yet it failed to anticipate and avert 9/11; it has failed to bring to justice its chief architects; it has failed to devise an effective response to Islamic extremism; it has failed to provide security in Iraq and Afghanistan, despite the expenditure of $3 trillion (when downstream costs are considered); and, it has abandoned America's reputation for being a just nation that adheres to law and ideals.
If this were a business, would anyone invest in it?
The competence level of the American military is not something to be emulated; it is closer to the level of General Motors and Wall Street.
Gen. David Petraeus and McChrystal are no more worthy of admiration than the progression of incompetent CEOs who drove GM into the ground and the crooks who pilfered the public with exotic financial instruments for their short-term profit.
Petraeus’s and McChrystal’s advice, which has been wrong in the past about Afghanistan, should neither be accepted at face value nor allowed to trump Obama's political judgments about the value and costs of continuing to wage war.
Military advice has the same relationship to good advice as military music has to good music.
We need to start measuring the military by the same standards we measure other costly investments: Is it working? Is it effective? Is it making the world more safe -- or less? Is America safer because we spent $3 trillion in Iraq?
The questions we need to be asking about Afghanistan are not included in McChrystal's call for a "new strategy," but they include the following: Why are we fighting the Taliban?
Afganistan: al-Qaida has LEFT THE BUILDING!
The Taliban never attacked America, and no one suggests they have the capacity or interest in attacking the American homeland; they are fighting Americans because Americans occupy their country. Petraeus acknowledges al-Qaida left Afghanistan long ago, but in the absence of al-Qaida we have simply substituted the Taliban as our enemy without asking whether this makes any sense.
And if the argument is that we have to stay in Afghanistan so al-Qaida doesn't return, does that mean forever -- at more than $100 billion per year?
What will it ultimately cost and how many American men and women will die for this mistaken policy?
Does it mean we should invade and occupy all other nations where al-Qaida might pop up? Already, al-Qaida is operating in Somalia and Indonesia, and what should we do about all the many weak and failed nations that potentially could be launching pads for terrorism -- do we invade and occupy them all, as well?
With the American economy faltering and falling deeper into debt to its most important strategic rival, China, can we afford the luxury of fighting expensive wars wherever terrorism potentially might arise?
What are the real strategic threats to the U.S., and is spending hundreds of billions more in Afghanistan getting in the way of more important security issues?
The Pentagon is now trying to muscle Obama into supporting the same costly policies that have failed in Afghanistan for eight years.
He should be reminded that Abraham Lincoln made a career of firing ineffective generals and got re-elected running, ironically, against one of the generals he had fired.
President Harry Truman fired one of the most popular generals in American history (Douglas MacArthur) and got re-elected shortly thereafter.
Obama cannot allow himself to be blackmailed by midgets and incompetents like McChrystal -- particularly in defense of a war that already has become very unpopular.
Once that kind of blackmail works, it never stops.
-- from Alternet
![]() |
Allah is Supreme!Some attention also has been paid to Obama's paternal side of the family, including his father and his brother, Roy.
Allah is Supreme!
Allah is Supreme! Allah is Supreme!
I witness that there is no god but Allah
I witness that there is no god but Allah
I witness that Muhammad is his prophet ...
Some dirt clod minion eager for a head-pat talked on Monday's KMBZ Shanin & Parks show about how his head was about to blow up at how outrageous that black group, uh, Acorn was for the sting last weekend. Of COURSE they got stung, ignorant as Acorn is. Course the only difference between Acorn and Haliburton or AT&T or any other major corporation on the Government dole is that they are niggers, not pin-striped-suited white men with lawyers, PR people and enough smarts not to let hidden cameras into their offices to TALK about hookers. Not that white men don't indulge themselves and their clients with HOOKERS. They do. But generally more carefully. Apparently white executives steal with more style and sophistication, and so won't get noticed by the 'new media' .
I was reminded first what the O'man said last weekend, and lets face it, he's smarter than ALL of his critics put together--and that must just COMPLETELY piss off those racists. He said the racist, hateful outrageous, rude crap we hear today by politicians are just 'catnip' to the cable people. He's so right. All this yelling and screaming and the cable need to feed the beast for ratings.
But I listened to some people on Kraske's UMKC show, talking about how completely screwed we are in Afghanistan. We sent our troops to the wrong country... well WE didn't, Bush did. Ignored the Afghanistan front. Gave them just enough heat to move next door to Pakistan but didn't actually take them OUT! Now Al-Qaeda is gone.
This is precisely why they were all surprised Obama won...and are befuddled to understand why. This isn't last summer. Election's over. Things not up for debate. They seem to think it's last summer and that's how they come off to their frustrated listeners.It's not Obama's job to give a general the tools he HOPES he needs to win a war with no objective. It's Obama's job to define the OBJECTIVE. Don't 50,000 gold-star parents in the US wish LBJ had done that!
As my daddy said, when youre digging yoruself into a hole, the first thing to do was stop digging. He was always a hawk so he never did apply that advice to his jingoistic attitude. But we're older and smarter now.
A basic of military strategy. You can TAKE territory with superior forces... but it will bleed you DRY to try to HOLD it! Show me a war that wasn't so, Scott Parks! You have blood on your hands because of what you HAVE NOT DONE, this past few years as you shilled gently for George W. Bush and his personal war against the wrong country to attack us.
Think of it. They're afraid of death. Like Terri Shievo's family, strive to postpone her meeting Jesus, no matter what the cost Government (that'd be YOU and ME) must pay! Delaying as long as possible--for YEARS-- the moment of going to meet Jesus! Fighting death, even with every trick and magic medical science can come up with.
I'll go further. Both Scott and Mike talked some about how people tend to listen generally only to ideas that substantiate their own preconceived ideas. I was so impressed that they'd chosen to pause from their usual right wing rants to talk about this. Well done! They could take it further, but that they have gone this far so far, is just soo good.
I don't think its racism to NOTICE those things or worry about them. I think it's just reality. Some are the fault of the white majority, and some are at the fault of blacks who have chosen to embrace their black culture, even when it's not so good. Like embracing hip hop, to make my point that all things cultural aren't so good.
Even suburban white sk8terbois!



This came off of DrudgeReport, which is very right wing. So I'm sure they chose the demographic that would most make Faux News look the best.
Like this uncomplimentary picture of Obama yesterday, and an out- of-context quote designed to leave a bad image, The Drudge Report unabashedly shills for the right. All weekend, Matt Drudge headlined stories to make our elected president look bad. 
Organized clowns to the left of me, morons to the right of me, Here I am. (Like the clown to the left, starting with his crowd waving and yelling when someone on his cellphone said the reporter was now on the air.) Rich people don't care about the masses. They have their stored capital in the bank and their stocks. And the dumb-asses who protested in Washington? Wonder how many of them work in health insurance??? So don't waste so much time and effort trying to be a capitalistic purist unless you make a million dollars a year off of other people's hard work. The ones organizing these spectacles are the wealthy class and their business-bribed, out-of-power Congressmen. The last thing they want is a people's president. They are having a hard time buying him off. They've bought off the Republicans with their contributions to the man...but this guy has style, and that's very dangerous to them!
The clever, expensive signs are designed to scare you. He hasn't changed. The country changed when we voted the arrogant Republicans out and Obama and Democrats in. Now these new people have begun doing exactly what they campaigned to do and won the election: clean up health care and get us out of wasteful wars.
What changed was who the president IS and what he promised to do if elected. It's an uphill battle because lobbyists outnumber congressmen six to one. So they're trying deliberately to discredit Obama himself with hateful images, and scare the already-scared nutcases who are in denial about him--even as he does what the majority of us want.
You must admit, the images we see from these staged protest marches are shocking. They are not who we really are, and don't portray the Obama we've seen. He make sense, shows compassion, and he is who we voted for to turn things back around.
Where did the Republicans learn how to protest for TV? I think they learned these protest tactics from the Iranians years ago, who could turn out "Death to America" protests wherever there was a CNN camera. Those doing it now are unpaid extras in those little CNN movies, just like the Arabs did when they held our hostages!